Catching Fire by Suzanne Collins
Wednesday, September 29th, 2010Catching Fire (Hardcover)
by Suzanne Collins
Scholastic Press, September 2009
391 Pages
Spoilers ahead, just FYI
I wasn’t quite sure where the story would go after Hunger Games. As we last left our hero, Katniss and Peeta had just won the Hunger Games. Now that 6 months has past, it is time for the traditional victory tour of the 12 Districts. Their first stop is District 11, home district of Rue who died in the most recent Hunger Games. In the previous book, the reader is only told little bits and pieces of the other districts but Katniss never travels to them. I was interested to see how all the different districts would react to being forced to throw a celebration for two kids who had hunted other kids from the district. However, District 11 is the only one that gets time devoted to it. All the others are quickly glossed over and forgotten. Oh, and then Peeta pops the question in an attempt to stop the uprisings that have started as a result of Katniss eating some berries at the end of the first book. As Katniss prepares for the wedding which she is dreading, she is recruited once again to compete in the Hunger Games along with Peeta.
Really?
We’re using the same plot device from the first book? The main appeal of the first book was the suspense of reading about the competition. But by going back in to the Hunger Games, it felt as if Suzanne Collins was acknowledging what made the first book good and just rehashing the same material. I was disappointed. After I finished the book and had some time to think about it, I concluded that Catching Fire serves the purpose of setting up the third act. The story needs to go from point A to point C but along the way it must pass through an awkward point B. There needed to be a transition from Katniss winning the Hunger Games in book one to leading a rebellion in the third book. Much like The Matrix
movies, the first entry in the series was good, but as it became a success there came a need to produce sequels which tried to add more complexity to what the first established. As a result we get more of the same in terms of action but the plot seems to take a backseat.
Don’t get me wrong, I liked The Matrix Reloaded just as much as I liked Catching Fire. Both were entertaining, and I don’t regret investing my time with them. In the end, though, I would have been content with just ending the Hunger Games series after the first book. I love/hate books that have nebulous endings. On one hand I want to know what happens to the characters. On the other, leaving a bunch of unanswered questions fosters discussion about the book for years to come. I remember reading The Giver
andFahrenheit 451
in high school and being appalled by the openness of their finales but those books had a more lasting impression on me than the other books I was forced to read.
I haven’t read Mockingjay
Second Opinions:
Wands and Worlds
Devourer of Books
The Book Smugglers
The Speculative Scotsman














